Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRAsA6i+sJyx7d5G7tR_wYACXMMF6GuOuDbFQPiBZBuicQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>)
List pgsql-hackers



About syntax: i vote for current syntax "reindex table CONCURRENTLY tablename". This looks consistent with existed CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY.

+1

Pavel


regards, Sergei

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqT%2B6igqbUb59y04NEgHoBeUGYteuUr89AKnLTFNdB8Hyw%40mail.gmail.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sergei Kornilov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: don't create storage when unnecessary