2012/7/20 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
>> I did a backport of temp_file_limit feature to 9.1, but when we tested
>> this patch, we found very restristrictive limit to 2GB.
>
>> 2GB is nonsense, because this is session limit of temp files, and
>> these files should be longer than 2GB.
>
> This claim is nonsense. The variable's value is measured in KB, so the
> effective limit is actually 2TB not 2GB.
you have true - it works on 9.2. The problem will be somewhere in
backport on 9.1
sorry for false alarm
Regards
Pavel Stěhule
>
> regards, tom lane
