Re: range_agg - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: range_agg
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRA1YVjA9QwMaV76UvdS2ERT_4wgLse94Y4BwhErYiN4jg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: range_agg  (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


čt 24. 9. 2020 v 2:05 odesílatel Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> napsal:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:55 PM Paul A Jungwirth
<pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote:
> This is rebased on the current master, including some changes to doc
> tables and pg_upgrade handling of type oids.

Here is a rebased version of this patch, including a bunch of cleanup
from Alvaro. (Thanks Alvaro!)

I tested this patch and It looks well, I have not any objections

1. there are not new warnings
2. make check-world passed
3. build doc without problems
4. doc is enough, regress tests too
5. there was not objection against this feature in discussion, and I think it is interesting and useful feature - good additional to arrays

Regards

Pavel




Paul

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel copy
Next
From: Ajin Cherian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions