Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-va=KukcnpUebKv2Y7XRxAvVokDDxD9QAcnZCzj3t30CQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Neha Sharma <neha.sharma@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 7:23 PM Neha Sharma <neha.sharma@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 11:12 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:

> \c postgres
> alter database test1 set tablespace tab1;
>
> --Cancel the below command after few seconds
> alter database test1 set tablespace pg_default;
>
> \c test1
> alter table t set tablespace tab1;
>
>
> Logfile Snippet:
> 2021-12-09 17:49:18.110 +04 [18151] PANIC:  could not fsync file "base/116398/116400": No such file or directory
> 2021-12-09 17:49:19.105 +04 [18150] LOG:  checkpointer process (PID 18151) was terminated by signal 6: Aborted
> 2021-12-09 17:49:19.105 +04 [18150] LOG:  terminating any other active server processes

Yeah, it seems like the fsync requests produced while copying database
objects to the new tablespace are not unregistered.  This seems like a
different issue than previously raised.  I will work on this next
week, thanks for testing.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions
Next
From: Himanshu Upadhyaya
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON: functions