Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-uNzEyY3YL1EZabWcG=Bah1nO8hno+-UaAkCDcfCGYC0g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 8:42 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:42 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The patch set was not applying on the head so I have rebased it.

I have changed the patch 0002 so that instead of logging the WAL for
each invalidation, now we log at each command end as discussed
upthread[1]

Soon we will evaluate the performance for the same and post the results.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1LOa%2B2KqNX%3Dm%3D1qMBDW%2Bo50AuwjAOX6ZqL-rWGiH1F9MQ%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Some problems of recovery conflict wait events
Next
From: David Zhang
Date:
Subject: Re: Making psql error out on output failures