Re: Proposal: Global Index for PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: Proposal: Global Index for PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-tzc4D9KqKRHJzWMB3QTB+KK1jKCThLCwSxa8RwcvrknQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Proposal: Global Index for PostgreSQL  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 1:08 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun  9, 2025 at 05:51:25PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun  9, 2025 at 03:28:38PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > There are certainly use cases where this would be helpful, but I think
> > the big question is whether it would have so many negatives that most
> > people who try to use it would eventually remove it.  I have heard that
> > happened to other relational systems who support global indexes, so I
> > think we have to consider that possibility.  The problem is you might
> > need to actually write the patch to find out.
>
> FYI, I wrote a blog about global indexes in 2020:

Oh interesting, I would be happy to have a look at it, Thanks.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yugo Nagata
Date:
Subject: Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects