Re: Logical Replication of sequences - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-tXpsLYtBfs8sEGuaUMav8xbS9D+8ARcdHnGDEfpWgdbw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Logical Replication of sequences  ("Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Re: Logical Replication of sequences
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 8:23 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
On Friday, October 24, 2025 11:22 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 16:47, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 11:45 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The attached patch has the changes for the same.
> > >
> >
> > I have pushed 0001 and the following are comments on 0002.
>
 
One question, I am not sure if this has been discussed before, So while getting sequence information from remote we are also getting the page_lsn of the sequence and we are storing that in pg_subscription_rel.  Is it just for the user to see and compare whether the sequence is synced to the latest lsn or is it used for anything else as well?  In our patch sert, I don't see much usability information about this field. 

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shlok Kyal
Date:
Subject: Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: Docs and tests for RLS policies applied by command type