Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-tSvYNu8uV5sVFRyxPZh2nWNsvRTezn1vc7Ar3kC6zZYQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:47 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
>
> du -s /tmp/initdb/
> WAL_LOG: 35112
> FILE_COPY: 29288
>
> So it seems we should specify a strategy in initdb? It kind of makes sense -
> we're not going to read anything from those database. And because of the
> ringbuffer of 256kB, we'll not even reduce IO meaningfully.

I think this makes sense, so you mean with initdb we will always use
file_copy or we want to give a command line option for initdb ?

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Assert in pageinspect with NULL pages
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs