Re: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-t2k-DOuuvc7iSO5ZvGWhaYEVmFXvF3Z=rqPzt8dRyYrQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication  ("tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 8:25 AM tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com
<tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 7:45 PMDilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have fixed all the pending issues, I see there is already a test
> > case for this so I have changed the output for that.
>
> Thanks for your patch. I tested it for all branches(10,11,12,13,HEAD) and all of them passed.(This bug was introduced
inPG-10.)
 
> I also tested the scenario where I found this bug, data could be synchronized after your fix.

Thanks for verifying this.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Are we missing (void) when return value of fsm_set_and_search is ignored?