On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 12:04 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 5:20 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have merged these patches and also merged 0001 and 0002. Also fixed
> > other open comments from Nisha, Shlok, and Peter
> >
>
> These are not needed:
>
> +++ b/src/include/replication/conflict.h
> +#include "catalog/pg_type.h"
>
> +++ b/src/backend/commands/lockcmds.c
> +#include "catalog/catalog.h"
>
> Plus we can have relevant docs added to this patch.
>
> I do not have any further comments on 001.
Thanks I have fixed these comments and also merged the docs. Apart
from those updates, I also missed the changes related to
pg_namespace_aclmask_ext [1], so I am adding them now. While Peter
suggested [2], that approach won't fix the revoke USAGE issue raised
by Nisha. We cannot simply return early here under the assumption that
ACL_USAGE is always allowed and ACL_CREATE is never allowed. Instead,
we need to mask ACL_CREATE and let the execution flow pass through for
other ACLs. This ensures that if ACL_USAGE has been explicitly
revoked, that revocation is correctly evaluated and respected.
[1]
--- a/src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c
@@ -3678,9 +3678,9 @@ pg_namespace_aclmask_ext(Oid nsp_oid, Oid roleid,
* Disallow creation in the conflict schema for everyone, including
* superusers, unless in binary-upgrade mode.
*/
- if (!IsBinaryUpgrade && (mask & ACL_CREATE) &&
- IsConflictLogTableNamespace(nsp_oid))
- return mask & ~ACL_CREATE;
+ if (!IsBinaryUpgrade && (mask & ACL_CREATE) &&
+ IsConflictLogTableNamespace(nsp_oid))
+ mask &= ~ACL_CREATE;
[2]
return mask & ACL_ALL_RIGHTS_SCHEMA & ~ACL_CREATE;
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google