Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Subject Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
Date
Msg-id CAFcNs+rptBOhFsQTMDgKuqfu0TYZFS+j-_JyFd0HGCapaBt_ww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> Sawada Masahiko wrote:
>
> > Thank you for reviewing.
> > I agree 2) - 5).
> > Attached patch is latest version patch I modified above.
> > Also, I noticed I had forgotten to add the patch regarding document of
> > reindexdb.
>
> Please don't use pg_catalog in the regression test.  That way we will
> need to update the expected file whenever a new catalog is added, which
> seems pointless.  Maybe create a schema with a couple of tables
> specifically for this, instead.
>

Attached new regression test.

Isn't better join the two patches in just one?

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add ssl_protocols configuration option
Next
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about RI checks