Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Subject Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Date
Msg-id CAFcNs+qgB+OLrrkuMqwR0=Egfj1hyXNFKs2Qg5-MDrLNEkayRg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I don't even understand why it's questionable whether this should be
> > fixed.
>
> Sigh.  We have some debate isomorphic to this one every year, it seems
> like.  The argument why it shouldn't be fixed now is: ITS. TOO. LATE.
> Which part of that isn't clear to you?
>

Sorry but I don't understand why it's too late. The 9.4 branch not been created yet.

And in the last hours various patches (mostly fixes) have been committed and IMO this is not different.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: min_recovery_apply_delay
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses