<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br />On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Robert Haas <<a href="mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com">robertmhaas@gmail.com</a>>wrote:<br />><br />> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:09PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello<br />> <<a href="mailto:fabriziomello@gmail.com">fabriziomello@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br/>> > Just one last doubt. Do we expose a new function called "current_database"<br />> > like "current_catalog","current_user", ... ?<br />><br />> Why would we do that?<br />><br /><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Wedon't need it... it's another patch.<br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Regards,<br/></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br />--<br />Fabrízio de Royes Mello<br />Consultoria/CoachingPostgreSQL<br />>> Timbira: <a href="http://www.timbira.com.br">http://www.timbira.com.br</a><br/>>> Blog: <a href="http://fabriziomello.github.io">http://fabriziomello.github.io</a><br/>>> Linkedin: <a href="http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello">http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello</a><br/>>> Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/fabriziomello">http://twitter.com/fabriziomello</a><br/>>> Github: <a href="http://github.com/fabriziomello">http://github.com/fabriziomello</a></div></div>
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных