On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Andres Freund (andres@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > > > > There's one argument for supporting more for VACUUM than the rest - it > > > can't be executed directly as the result of a query as the others > > > can... I wonder if that'd not better be answered by adding a feature to > > > vacuumdb that allows selecting the to-be-vacuumed table by a user > > > defined query. > > > > Wow. That's certainly an interesting idea. > > +1. >
Then to simplify can we allow the "--table" option of vacuumdb act similar to the "--table" option of pg_dump??
