<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br />On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera <<a
href="mailto:alvherre@2ndquadrant.com">alvherre@2ndquadrant.com</a>>wrote:<br />><br />> Stephen Frost
wrote:<br/>> > * Andres Freund (<a href="mailto:andres@2ndquadrant.com">andres@2ndquadrant.com</a>) wrote:<br
/>><br/>> > > There's one argument for supporting more for VACUUM than the rest - it<br />> > >
can'tbe executed directly as the result of a query as the others<br />> > > can... I wonder if that'd not
betterbe answered by adding a feature to<br />> > > vacuumdb that allows selecting the to-be-vacuumed table by
auser<br />> > > defined query.<br />> ><br />> > Wow. That's certainly an interesting idea.<br
/>><br/>> +1.<br />><br /><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Then to simplify can we allow the "--table"
optionof vacuumdb act similar to the "--table" option of pg_dump??<br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div
class="gmail_extra">Regards,<br/><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">--<br />Fabrízio de Royes Mello<br
/>Consultoria/CoachingPostgreSQL<br />>> Timbira: <a
href="http://www.timbira.com.br">http://www.timbira.com.br</a><br/>>> Blog: <a
href="http://fabriziomello.github.io">http://fabriziomello.github.io</a><br/>>> Linkedin: <a
href="http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello">http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello</a><br/>>> Twitter: <a
href="http://twitter.com/fabriziomello">http://twitter.com/fabriziomello</a><br/>>> Github: <a
href="http://github.com/fabriziomello">http://github.com/fabriziomello</a></div></div>
