On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > > On 4/17/14, 8:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > We could in fact implement #2, I imagine, by destroying and recreating > > the entire language interpreter. So I could imagine implementing a > > "DISCARD INTERPRETERS" kind of command that would zap the current > > interpreter(s) for whichever PL languages happened to feel like > > cooperating with the command. > > More generally, any extension could maintain any kind of cross-call > state. plproxy, dblink, pgmemcache come to mind. A general hook into > DISCARD might be doable, but then it's not clear how to categorize this > into DISCARD subcommands. >
I proposed some like that in a previous message [1].
