On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:59 PM Tom Lane <
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Fabrízio de Royes Mello <
fabriziomello@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:27 PM Tom Lane <
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Which, TBH, makes me wonder about the validity of the original complaint
> >> in this thread. I don't mind delaying ET restore as long as we feasibly
> >> can; but if you have an ET that is going to misbehave during restore,
> >> you are in for pain, and it's hard to consider that that pain isn't
> >> self-inflicted.
>
> > The proposed patch solve the original complain. I was just trying to
> > understand completely what you pointed out before and I agree with you.
> > Thanks for the clear explanation.
>
> OK, thanks for confirming that this solves your issue in practice.
>
> > About the patch LGTM and IMHO we should back-patch it to all supported
> > versions.
>
> Done.
>
Great, thanks!
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
