Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Does Type Have = Operator? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Subject Re: Does Type Have = Operator?
Date
Msg-id CAFcNs+o8gd9nEeVYFEoTaYwtZPOW7cVB=6F2ZvG1gON28tsLtg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Does Type Have = Operator?  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
Responses Re: Does Type Have = Operator?  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view


On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:07 AM, David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote:
>
> On May 10, 2016, at 5:56 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Searching for the operator in pg_operator catalog isn't enought?
>
> Seems like overkill, but will do if there’s nothing else.
>

I know... but you can do that just in case the current behaviour fail by cathing it with "begin...exception...", so you'll minimize the looking for process on catalog.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered