Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From MARK CALLAGHAN
Subject Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16
Date
Msg-id CAFbpF8MzS=a1qkfbmr51Mv6phQ9-pKz+P_tB3fN_eJObrVY+fQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16  (MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16
List pgsql-hackers


On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 10:01 PM MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com> wrote:
I have two more runs of the benchmark in progress so we will have 3 results for each of the test cases to confirm that the small regressions are repeatable.

They get similar results. Then I tried Linux perf but the hierarchical call stacks, to be used for Flamegraph, have too many "[unknown]" entries.
I was using: ./configure --prefix=$pfx --enable-debug CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -mtune=native -flto" LDFLAGS="-flto" > o.cf.$x 2> e.cf.$x
Adding -no-omit-frame-pointer fixes the problem, so I am repeating the benchmark with that to confirm there are still regressions and then I will get flamegraphs.

--
Mark Callaghan
mdcallag@gmail.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: psql tests hangs