~
Well, at least I thought you would tell me where the postgresql-base
is to be found. The last version I found is:
~
http://freebsd.csie.nctu.edu.tw/pub/distfiles/postgresql/postgresql-base-8.3beta2.tar.bz2
~
and I wondered what that is and why there are no postgresql-base
after "8.3beta2"
~
> I cannot imagine you would benefit that much by removing these capabilities compared to simply ignoring them.
> Plus, by having it in the DB I avoid considerable considerable overhead
~
Can you or do you know of anyone who has made those kinds of
imaginations falsifiable?
~
> ... and can now use those features within my SQL statements/queries.
~
For what exactly? Isn't a comparison on 4 numeric bytes (1 (or 1/2)
word in modern hardware) more efficient than comparing sequences of
string characters?
~
> simply guessing that in simply being feature rich PostgreSQL has sub-optimal performance
~
I never said that
~
> ... you might want to look at SQLite. It provides a number of compile-time options where you can exclude various
featuresyou don't want from the binary
~
I couldn't find the compile options you mentioned: sqlite.org/
{faq.html, custombuild.html, docs.html}
~
> ... you're looking for a non-sql compliant SQL database where a lot of the data integrity is actually coded in the
application:-)
~
First past of your statement I acknowledged, but how is it exactly
that "lot of the data integrity is actually coded in the application"
~
> That approach strips down on application complexity. My apps don't have to do any post-processing
of the data - I query the records I need and the app merely displays them.
~
Again have you actually tested those assumptions?
~
> My point being: postgresql does what it does very reliably
~
I never said otherwise
~
lbrtchx
