Re: Batch TIDs lookup in ambulkdelete - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matheus Alcantara
Subject Re: Batch TIDs lookup in ambulkdelete
Date
Msg-id CAFY6G8dT83G5yvEJW=HrAZPaNQK5o=nJ-9neQFtrbsmSa5+Qcw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Batch TIDs lookup in ambulkdelete  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/06/25 18:34, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> Thank you for the report. With the 0001 and 0002 patches, I got a
> SEGV. I've fixed this issue in the attached updated version patches.
> I've confirmed that the patches pass CI tests but I'm not sure it
> fixes the shared memory segment leak problem you reported. The
> attached patches incorporated the comments[1] from John as well.
>

Thanks for the new version. I've tested the v3 version attached on [1]
and I can confirm that the tests are now passing and I can't see the
shared memory issues that I've mentioned on v1.

Thanks!

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoAcfp5kdcsT5727Vw4JF-Rw7b73zXh_GwXqNHg3P7-UoA%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
Matheus Alcantara



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Periodic FSM vacuum doesn't happen in one-pass strategy vacuum.
Next
From: Dmitry Koval
Date:
Subject: Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands