On Sun, Aug 23, 2026 at 5:56 AM Mihail Nikalayeu
<mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The fix and a reproducer are in the attachments.
>
> Affects 16 and up, from 89e46da5e51.
>
The patch looks good, just a small suggestion that the function header
of IsIndexUsableForReplicaIdentityFull() probably could do with a
comment so that future callers are aware of this potential shortfall.
Something like:
* Note that this function does not check indisvalid. Callers that are
* selecting an index to use for future lookups must check indisvalid
* themselves and reject invalid indexes
regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia