Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ajin Cherian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date
Msg-id CAFPTHDaSCG6pCzDxWLrAD3=pkz878agHxuiyXgxL9Xzu6QXWFA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses RE: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  ("tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 9:13 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:

> I tried the v95-0001 patch.
>
> - The patch applied cleanly and all build / testing was OK.
> - The documentation also builds OK.
> - I checked all v95-0001 / v93-0001 differences and found no problems.
> - Furthermore, I noted that v95-0001 patch is passing the cfbot [1].
>
> So this patch LGTM.
>

Applied, reviewed and tested the patch.
Also ran a 5 level cascaded standby setup running a modified pgbench
that does two phase commits and it ran fine.
Did some testing using empty transactions and no issues found
The patch looks good to me.

regards,
Ajin Cherian



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Drouvot, Bertrand"
Date:
Subject: [bug] Logical Decoding of relation rewrite with toast does not reset toast_hash
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output