On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
neha khatri <nehakhatri5@gmail.com> writes: > Does the community believe that the existing INFO message, as shown below, > is clear enough for the users. > "btree operator family "bpchar_ops" contains function > bpcharcmp(character,character) with wrong signature for support number 1"
Well, that message is targeted at somebody who's built a btree operator class and is testing it, so I should think it would be clear enough to them.