On 2025-10-14 Tu 4:01 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 09:33:10AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Great, I think this is a definite improvement. I saw someone recently >> complaining about this overuse of ok(), so thanks for doing the work to >> improve it. > Yeah, it's really cool to see someone step up and do all this leg > work for the existing code. I have not checked the patch in details > or if there are missing spots. Andrew, is that something you are > planning to do?
I believe Sadhuprasad used this recipe to find these: