Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dominique Devienne
Subject Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS
Date
Msg-id CAFCRh-_NmVAWUWyK0p4whpUnCtjVhavThRgnP8L9uyw=ZmEfvQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS  (Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 5:31 PM Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 5:12 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
> > On 9/4/25 08:03, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > > But now, we've ascertain that a particular test is:
> > > OK with 16.9 and 17.5 (we cannot test on beta2 anymore)
> > > KO with 16.10 and 17.6 (and beta3 too, released at the same time)
>
> > How did you move from one version to the other?
>
> We first upgraded in place. Broke that test.

We're still naive I guess. And didn't expect a minor upgrade to break us...

Given this mishap, we'll do the reverse from now on.
Install fresh clusters for the new versions (minor or not), and see
what happens.
So we don't "advance" our main/primary (testing) clusters until
"issues are resolved".



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dominique Devienne
Date:
Subject: Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS
Next
From: Albrecht Dreß
Date:
Subject: Re: Q: limit the length of log file entries?