Re: Extension disappearing act - Mailing list pgsql-general

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 4:18 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
> On 6/19/25 06:09, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > Hi. Little mystery we don't understand. v17.
> Does 'all' include the public schema?

No. We don't touch `public` at all, beside pgcrypto ending up inside it.

> > Of course, the DB owner role was not dropped. Can't in fact.
> > Somehow, the pgcrypto extension has disappeared, as side-effects of the drops.
>
> Was it in fact installed in the public schema?

Sure was. It's my own command, but good enough. --DD

D:\>ppg -c my17 -d dd_v168a database_ --extensions
Connected OK (postgresql://ddevienne@localhost:5417/dd_v168a)
=======================================================
|   Name   | Version |       Owner       |   Schema   |
=======================================================
| pgcrypto | 1.3     | "Acme-DBA:000ik2" | public     |
| plpgsql  | 1.0     | postgres          | pg_catalog |
=======================================================
2 installed extensions (out of 61)

Which runs

SELECT extname, extversion,
       extowner::regrole::text as owner,
       extnamespace::regnamespace::text as "schema"
  FROM pg_extension
 ORDER BY 1