Re: Template for schema? (as opposed to databases) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dominique Devienne
Subject Re: Template for schema? (as opposed to databases)
Date
Msg-id CAFCRh-8_iGhqU9Q30AFpTQkuk_yZKSPbHhUZ6Z1Erg8UyjxbeQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Template for schema? (as opposed to databases)  (Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 5:38 PM Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com> wrote:
> Right now, that implies quite a few round-trips to the server, about 1'100, but on the LAN with sub-ms latency;

How much sub-ms? I mean, I have 0.74 pings to my router, but this
would be .82s, a good chunk of your quoted 2-3s, (and I'm not sure if libpq can do all queries in one RTT ).

Windows ping only says:
bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 

But Linux ping does say:
icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.236 ms (I picked the worse one).

So even with 1K round-trips, that should account only for +/- 250ms (1/10th the total). --DD

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dominique Devienne
Date:
Subject: Re: Template for schema? (as opposed to databases)
Next
From: Dominique Devienne
Date:
Subject: Re: Template for schema? (as opposed to databases)