On Sat, Mar 14, 2026 at 5:41 AM Igor Korot <ikorot01@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anybody use libpq from C++?
Yes
> C++ introduces STL.
> C++ introduces smart-pointers.
> Is there a simple way of using those writing libpq communication?
> Or should I just forget about them and use good old "dump pointers"?
Using an existing wrapper is simplest, of course.
We wrote our own. To each its own. E.g.
PS: Avoid the fwd-decl by using the actual libpq headers instead.
extern "C" {
struct pg_conn;
struct pg_result;
typedef struct pg_conn PGconn;
typedef struct pg_result PGresult;
typedef struct _PQconninfoOption PQconninfoOption;
typedef struct pgNotify PGnotify;
void PQfreemem(void *ptr);
void PQclear(PGresult* res);
void PQfinish(PGconn* conn);
void PQconninfoFree(PQconninfoOption* conn);
} // extern "C"
namespace acme::postgresql {
struct PGDeleterFunctor {
void operator()(PGresult* r) {
if (r != nullptr) {
PQclear(r);
}
}
void operator()(PGconn* c) {
if (c != nullptr) {
PQfinish(c);
}
}
void operator()(PQconninfoOption* c) {
if (c != nullptr) {
PQconninfoFree(c);
}
}
void operator()(PGnotify* n) {
if (n != nullptr) {
PQfreemem(n);
}
}
};
using PGresult_uptr = std::unique_ptr<PGresult, PGDeleterFunctor>;
using PGconn_uptr = std::unique_ptr<PGconn, PGDeleterFunctor>;
using PGconninfo_uptr = std::unique_ptr<PQconninfoOption, PGDeleterFunctor>;
using PGnotify_uptr = std::unique_ptr<PGnotify, PGDeleterFunctor>;
...
}
Then we have higher-level wrappers that compose those RAII low-level ones. --DD
