On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 1:29 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> Are you planning to press ahead with these?
I was waiting for feedback on the latest set, so tomorrow I'll see
about the FIXME and remove the leftover bogus include. I was thinking
of applying the guc-file patches separately and then squashing the
rest since they're *mostly* mechanical:
> > Subject: [PATCH v4 01/11] Preparatory refactoring for compiling guc-file.c
> > standalone
> > Subject: [PATCH v4 02/11] Move private declarations shared between guc.c and
> > guc-file.l to new header
> > Subject: [PATCH v4 03/11] Build guc-file.c standalone
>
> 01-03 are a bit more complicated, but still look not far off. There's a FIXME
> about failing headercheck.
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
