Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsHTRt9bqGyQzi_3jPp5DOPT0PcRUMGeFfOt7HzdztOCNA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> The fix is easy enough -- set the child pointer to null upon deletion, but I'm somewhat astonished that the regression tests didn't hit this. I do still intend to replace this code with something faster, but before I do so the tests should probably exercise the deletion paths more. Since VACUUM

Oops. I meant to finish with "Since VACUUM doesn't perform deletion we didn't have an opportunity to detect this during that operation."

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Next
From: rajesh singarapu
Date:
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs