Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsHJYi8Q1EuSg=QV+ZGb08ej25XQA7jAcG49bJTqKhrrbA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 7:52 PM John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 1:26 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Good point. While keeping the chunks in the small nodes in sorted
> > order is useful for visiting all keys in sorted order, additional
> > branches and memmove calls could be slow.
>
> Right, the ordering is a property that some users will need, so best to keep it. Although the node128 doesn't have that property -- too slow to do so, I think.

Nevermind, I must have been mixing up keys and values there...

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Pruning never visible changes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v13