Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsHDNrNSK4PDfKDArzVDEE2zozgMQZ0NbwMJmOfAC-xhbA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:16 PM John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Thanks for that! Now I can show clear results on some aspects in a simple way. The attached patches (apply on top of v6) 

Forgot the patchset...

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available