Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsGWxGZTa62N=hr2U+T3P6yYEUsbdpy-q0NYJSzpdKb4bw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 3:13 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In the code comments, it is being used as "Startup process" in the
> middle of the sentences whereas in most of the places "startup
> process" is used. Also, "WAL Sender" is being used instead of "WAL
> sender". Let's be consistent across the docs and code comments.

FWIW, docs need to hold to a higher standard than code comments.

-- 
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-decimal integer literals
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 1173, ...