Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From John Naylor
Subject Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsGMohyrt=76DnqtKNy6gYnra2qB+Kct1oOkUz6EX5AgZA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 3:22 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > Here's a draft fix for master, with regression tests.
>
> Passes an eyeball check, though I didn't run the test.

Pushed, thanks for looking! I'll keep an eye on the build farm.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17061: Impossible to query the fields of the tuple created by SEARCH BREADTH FIRST BY .. SET ..