Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsGG5DpyyaTdu16+SOhSTcfQH2YcxWY0=0ryPcEdO1d=FQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 9:34 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 9:34 PM John Naylor
> <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > That's an interesting idea, and the analogous behavior to aset could be a good thing for readability and maintainability. Worth seeing if it's workable.
>
> I've attached a quick hack patch. It can be applied on top of v32
> patches. The changes to dsa.c are straightforward since it makes the
> initial and max block sizes configurable.

Good to hear -- this should probably be proposed in a separate thread for wider visibility.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Eliminating SPI from RI triggers - take 2
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format