On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:00 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 3/10/23 11:03, John Naylor wrote:
> > + * When we're called via the SQL SRF there's already a transaction > > > > I see this was copied from existing code, but I found it confusing -- > > does this function have a stable name? > > What do you mean by "stable name"? It certainly is not exposed as a > user-callable SQL function, so I think this comment it misleading and > should be removed.
Okay, I was just trying to think of why it was phrased this way...
