Re: cutting down the TODO list thread - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: cutting down the TODO list thread
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsEv1kkDih5D_nodrQguK6F5QfjcZBcL8qXuR54o58MApw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cutting down the TODO list thread  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: cutting down the TODO list thread  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

I wrote:

> We could also revise the developer FAQ:
> - remove phrase "Outstanding features are detailed in Todo."
> - add suggestion to to check the Todo or Not_worth_doing pages to see if the desired feature is undesirable or problematic
> - rephrase "Working in isolation is not advisable because others might be working on the same TODO item, or you might have misunderstood the TODO item." so it doesn't mention 'TODO' at all.

There is also

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/So,_you_want_to_be_a_developer%3F#TODOs

Changing the description of what links to the todo list will probably do more to reduce confusion than language in the todo list itself.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Add BufFileRead variants with short read and EOF detection
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete