Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsEkEZieWaV+E+TtSLhtSOkk=O4q_zed+28ocUh8zbj7iA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 9:44 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've attached v42 patch set. I improved tidstore regression test codes
> in addition of imcorporating the above comments.

Seems fine at a glance, thanks. I will build on this to implement variable-length values. I have already finished one prerequisite which is: public APIs passing pointers to values.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong rows estimations with joins of CTEs slows queries by more than factor 500
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: persist logical slots to disk during shutdown checkpoint