Re: i.e. and e.g. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: i.e. and e.g.
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsEZdnYuc984iGaSqt-_Ywq_AM1Mk5BNpQXVeetaRmjkLQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: i.e. and e.g.  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: i.e. and e.g.
List pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:22 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At Thu, 21 Jul 2022 10:20:30 +0700, John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote in
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 3:40 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > By the way, I forgot about back-branches. Don't we need to fix the
> > > same in back-branches?
> >
> > The intent of the messages is pretty clear to me, so I don't really see a
> > need to change back branches. It does make sense for v15, though, and I
> > just forgot to consider that.
>
> Ok, I'm fine with that. Thanks!

This is done.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove useless arguments in ReadCheckpointRecord().