2012/10/15 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>:
> Sorry, but this doesn't strike me as a very good idea at all. Why not just
> alter the table ownership after the restore is done?
Yes, I could restore, wrote later ALTER ... OWNER TO ... - but this
method allowed me to do it quicker.
> If we start allowing
> stuff other than the TOC ID to be specified in the list file the
> modifications will never end.
Understood, sounds reasonably.
> BTW, I realize your patch is small, but it's usually a good idea to discuss
> an idea on the mailing list before sending in a patch.
I've new here, next time I will send idea and wait for response before
sending any patch.
--
Piotr Gasidło
