Re: Incorrect information about GIN-index in RUM's docs - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Oleg Bartunov
Subject Re: Incorrect information about GIN-index in RUM's docs
Date
Msg-id CAF4Au4zJKKmxYrta5hfN8qFJRSYE1tvRCottPkNYV2+UY7T70Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Incorrect information about GIN-index in RUM's docs  (Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>)
Responses Re: Incorrect information about GIN-index in RUM's docs  (Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>)
List pgsql-general


On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com> wrote:
This item isn't valid, is it?
 
  • There isn't phrase search with GIN index. This problem relates with previous problem. It is need position information to perform phrase search.
RUM being an extention, and having index-access-methods as extentions is new in 9.6, where phrase-search was introduced, this isn't really true, or am I missing something?

RUM is very good for phrase search, since it has access to coordinates in index, check slides from PGconf.eu (http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/talks/pgconfeu-fts-2016.pdf).  Where did you find the citation ?

 
 
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Date:
Subject: Incorrect information about GIN-index in RUM's docs
Next
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?