Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jing Wang
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE
Date
Msg-id CAF3+xMJaiCeyDsSx=4nYCg5G3BjVR6xgV2=_95O2G3OsR8MQrA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE
List pgsql-hackers
>Not surprisingly, this patch no longer applies in the wake of commit
>b3f840120.  Rather than rebasing the pg_dump portions, I would suggest
>you just drop them. 

It  has been removed from the pg_dump codes.

>I notice some other patch application failures in dbcommands.c,
>objectaddress.c, and user.c, so there's more work to do besides
>this
Yes.  fixed it.

Enclosed please find the latest patch fixed above.


Regards,
Jing Wang
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Further cleanup of pg_dump/pg_restore item selection code