Re: refactoring basebackup.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Suraj Kharage
Subject Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Date
Msg-id CAF1DzPUg+JmL4Vr221ucBKzq-WhOZb7Zu2Xd5-D4ToxqQNhvjQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: refactoring basebackup.c  (Dipesh Pandit <dipesh.pandit@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:45 AM Dipesh Pandit <dipesh.pandit@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I have repeated the experiment with 8K block size and found that the results are not varying much after applying the patch.
Please find the details below.


Later I connected with Suraj to validate the experiment details and found that the setup and steps followed are exactly the same in this
experiment when compared with the previous experiment.


Thanks Dipesh.
It looks like the results are not varying much with your run as you followed the same steps.
One of my run with 8kb which took more time than others might be because of noise at that time.

--
--

Thanks & Regards, 
Suraj kharage, 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "movead.li@highgo.ca"
Date:
Subject: Re: A patch for get origin from commit_ts.
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: warnings for invalid function casts