Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Florent Guillaume
Subject Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal
Date
Msg-id CAF-4BpPTHo3zXV_hk8Yy_3MHrz2c5KUeeohyzjjVzUHuFtOF3A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal  ("David Johnston" <polobo@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> DocSea - Patrice Delorme <pdelorme@docsea.com> wrote:
>
>> It is impossible to fetch data when numeric value in database is
>> NaN
>> It throws FAST_NUMBER_FAILED
>> (postgresql-jdbc-9.1-902:AbstractJdbc2ResultSet:2176) because my
>> value is not numeric (NaN).
>> This is incorect behaviour since 'NaN' is a legal value in
>> postgres for numeric type.
>
> How do you expect what you read to be represented in Java?

java.lang.Double.NaN I guess.


--
Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
http://www.nuxeo.com   http://www.nuxeo.org   +33 1 40 33 79 87


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: send/receive buffer size
Next
From: "David Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal