On 26 May 2016 at 06:04, Patrick Baker <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've got the following query:
>>
>>
>> SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT j0_.id) AS sclr10
>> FROM customers j0_
>> WHERE ((LOWER(j0_.name_first) LIKE '%some%'
>> OR LOWER(j0_.name_last) LIKE '%some%')
>> AND j0_.id = 5)
>> AND j0_.id = 5
>
>
> The query is taking ages to run.
Your guess is as good as ours without knowing what query plan the
database decided on. Post the output of explain analyze.
> I read about wildcards and it seems I have to use a function with
> to_tsvector ?
In general, you have to use an expression of which the query planner
can see that it's equivalent to the expression used in the index.
Otherwise the query planner has no way of knowing whether the index is
suitable for the query and it won't use the index.
>> CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY ON public.customers USING gin ("clientid",
>> ("full_text_universal_cast"("name_first"::"text")),
>> ("full_text_universal_cast"("name_last"::"text")));
In your case, you should query on full_text_universal_cast(your_field)
instead of on like '%some%'.
Alternatively, if your query always uses the sanme wildcard expression
you could create indexes on your_field like '%some%'.
> full_text_universal_cast:
>>
>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.full_text_universal_cast(doc_data
>> "text")
>> RETURNS "tsvector" AS
>> $BODY$
>> SELECT to_tsvector('english', COALESCE(TRIM(CAST(doc_data AS TEXT)), ''));
>> $BODY$
>> LANGUAGE sql IMMUTABLE
>> COST 1000;
The query planner has no way of knowing what this function does
internally, so it certainly won't match the function results in the
index up with your like expression.
Regards,
Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
