On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 00:05, Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com> wrote:
> Where Tom's solution fails is with smaller companies that cannot afford
> this level of infrastructure.
Is there an objection to openldap? It's lightweight (so could
reasonably be run on the same hardware without significant impact),
BSD-ish and mature, and (with the password policy overlay) should
provide exactly the functionality the OP requested.
Geoff
