Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: SQL-level pg_datum_image_equal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthias van de Meent
Subject Re: SQL-level pg_datum_image_equal
Date
Msg-id CAEze2WjUyYhcUwzaPiQbe-xBB_knbnG8Xr_9ACL7HrGVx=Vydw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: SQL-level pg_datum_image_equal  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SQL-level pg_datum_image_equal
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 at 16:25, Matthias van de Meent
<boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 at 14:15, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
> > maybe Table 9.76
> > (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-info.html#FUNCTIONS-INFO-CATALOG)
> > is the right place for this function.
>
> I think table 9.3
> (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/functions-comparison.html#FUNCTIONS-COMPARISON-FUNC-TABLE)
> makes more sense, as this is more a compare function than one that
> exposes catalog information about the input.

Attached is v2, which adds the new function to the docs, in addition
to rebasing the patch onto master.


Kind regards,

Matthias van de Meent
Databricks (https://www.databricks.com)
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Use CASEFOLD() internally rather than LOWER()
Next
From: Alexandre Felipe
Date:
Subject: Re: SLOPE - Planner optimizations on monotonic expressions.