Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthias van de Meent
Subject Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths
Date
Msg-id CAEze2WiNGUmxccd2bUywtLjHKSJTqpx=frcB1pOGhbs0CRkq9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Apart from registering this in CF 2022-07 last Friday, I've also just
added this issue to the Open Items list for PG15 under "Older bugs
affecting stable branches"; as a precaution to not lose track of this
issue in the buzz of the upcoming feature freeze.

-Matthias



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: document the need to analyze partitioned tables