On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 at 20:35, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> So I think the correct fix is that there needs to be a separate
> boolean tracking whether this work has been done, akin to
> ExecGetExtraUpdatedCols's use of ri_extraUpdatedCols_valid.
Why would it need a new boolean? ri_extraUpdatedCols_valid tracks
exactly whether we've already gone through ExecInitGenerated(...,
CMD_UPDATE), and in doing so if both ri_extraUpdatedCols,
ri_GeneratedExprsU, and ri_NumGeneratedNeededU are valid or whether
they still need to be populated. Adding a new boolean would therefore
be rather duplicative.
See also the patch of a few hours ago at [0].
Kind regards,
Matthias van de Meent
Databricks (https://www.databricks.com)
[0] https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2Wh%2B_C8LtmiMRb58df%3DA1PrBVmMnYMOfbBUk9c%3Dm99CN%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com
