Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthias van de Meent
Subject Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing
Date
Msg-id CAEze2WhhoTPRaHwS+PtA4D+2pipfPJpVR5HuMjJM2iWH3f3GRw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 11:51, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 8:16 PM Matthias van de Meent
> <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> AFAICU, in the thread referred by you, it seems that the main reported
> issue will be resolved by this patch but there is a discussion about
> xmin moving backward which seems to be the case with the current code
> as per code comments mentioned by Andres. Is my understanding correct?

That is correct.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: prevent immature WAL streaming
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)